Te Pou - Home

o Te Whakaara Nui

Database of New Zealand mental health research

Print

Status
Completed 21 July 2003

Created
24 September 2009

Last updated
25 September 2009

Delusions: The continuum versus category debate

Investigator(s) / AuthorsRichard Mullen

 
Principal contact
Name Dr Richard Mullen
Email Email address is not available; please contact
keadmin@tepou.co.nz for more information.
The research
Summary Critical review of the recently developed idea that delusions are best considered as part of a continuum along with more ordinary human beliefs.
Objectives Critical review of the recently developed idea that delusions are best considered as part of a continuum along with more ordinary human beliefs.
Study design A literature review of the area was guided by a Medline search, and supplemented with material already known to the author. Claims that recent research supports the continuum hypothesis is critiqued.
Methods Qualitative
Results The argument and evidence advanced for the continuum approach to delusions depends largely on: (i) inadequacies of prevailing definitions of delusion, particularly in the light of evidence that delusional conviction is often not absolute; and (ii) the high prevalence of unusual beliefs in community populations. To the extent that the delusion construct contains much in addition to conviction and unusual or false belief content, the continuity approach is weak. The category of delusions continues to have some validity.
Conclusions Both categorical and continuous approaches to delusions have validity that depends at any time on our immediate clinical or scientific needs. No definitive resolution of the category versus continuum debate is likely to emerge.
Key Descriptors Symptoms
Disciplines Psychology, Multi disciplinary
Settings Other
Diagnostic Categories Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia
Populations General Population
Other Keywords category, continuum, delusion
Ethics approval Yes
Academic led Yes
Service led No
How were service users involved No involvement
Publication in peer review journal Yes
Supporting information
Uploaded files
Links
 

Page last updated: 7 November 2008