Te Pou - Home

o Te Whakaara Nui

Database of New Zealand mental health research

Print

Status
Completed 1 July 2004

Created
25 September 2009

Last updated
25 September 2009

How mental health clinicians view community treatment orders: A national New Zealand survey

Investigator(s) / AuthorsSarah Romans, John Dawson, Richard Mullen, Anita Gibbs

 
Principal contact
Name Dr Richard Mullen
Email Email address is not available; please contact
keadmin@tepou.co.nz for more information.
The research
Summary To determine New Zealand mental health clinicians’ views about community treatment orders, indications for their use, their benefits, problems and impact on patients and therapeutic relationships.
Objectives To determine New Zealand mental health clinicians’ views about community treatment orders, indications for their use, their benefits, problems and impact on patients and therapeutic relationships.
Study design A national survey of New Zealand psychiatrists and a regional survey of nonpsychiatric community mental health professionals for comparison.
Methods Survey
Results The great majority of NZ psychiatrists prefer to work with community treatment orders as an option. They consider they are used properly in most cases, can enhance patients’ priority for care, provide a structure for treatment, support continuing contact and produce a period of stability for patients during which other therapeutic changes can occur. They consider these orders can harm therapeutic relationships, especially in the short term, but when used appropriately their overall benefits outweigh their coercive impact. The other mental health professionals surveyed have similar views. A minority of clinicians do not support their use.
Conclusions The precise impact of community treatment orders on patients’ quality of life remains an open question. Until that matter is more clearly resolved, New Zealand law should continue to authorise compulsory outpatient care, provided it is carefully targeted and adequate community services are available.
Key Descriptors Intervention/Treatment
Disciplines Psychiatry, Multi disciplinary
Settings Outpatient
Diagnostic Categories Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Other
Populations General Population
Other Keywords coercion, legal status, outpatient commitment, patient compliance
Ethics approval Yes
Academic led Yes
Service led No
How were service users involved No involvement
Publication in peer review journal Yes
Supporting information
Uploaded files
Links
 

Page last updated: 7 November 2008